HomeResourcesElection-related Legal Opinions and Comments
Resources
Election-related Legal Opinions and Comments
Legal books line the shelves of ODIHR's Elections Department. (OSCE/Agnieszka Rembowska) Photo details
Joint Opinion on the Law on Amending Some Legislative Acts on the Election of the President of Ukraine
This joint opinion is intended to assist the authorities of Ukraine to further develop and improve the legislative framework for the conduct of democratic elections in order to meet OSCE commitments and Council of Europe and other international standards. The Venice Commission and OSCE/ODIHR remain committed to provide assistance to further improve the legal framework for elections in Ukraine. However, the extent to which any amendments to the law can have a positive impact will ultimately be determined by the level of good faith and political will exhibited by state institutions and officials responsible for implementing and upholding the law.
Joint Opinion on Draft Laws on Electoral Legislation of Serbia
This joint opinion of the Venice Commission and OSCE/ODIHR comments on the following draft laws of the Republic of Serbia: Draft Law on the Unified Register of Voters, Draft Law on the State Election Commission, and Draft Law on Election of Councillors. The texts relied on are unofficial English translations. This joint opinion does not warrant the accuracy of the translations reviewed, including the numbering of articles paragraphs, and sub-paragraphs.
Joint Opinion on the Electoral Code of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as revised on 29 October 2008
The present opinion was elaborated following resolution 1320 (2003) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which invites the Venice Commission to formulate opinions concerning possible improvements to legislation and practices in particular member States or applicant countries. The recent amendments include changes in the voter turnout requirement for presidential elections, out-of-country voting, voter registration, campaign finance and the complaints and appeals process. Some of the amendments are based on a draft working text amending the electoral code, which was reviewed by the Venice Commission and the OSCE/ODIHR in 2007 (CDL-AD(2007)012). This current review should be read together with this document and other relevant Joint Opinions (see par. 4). Many comments in previous texts have been taken into account, although others remain to be addressed. Not all are included in this document.
Joint Opinion on the Draft Law No. 3366 Abour Elections tro the Parliament of Ukraine
This joint opinion on the Draft Law No. 3366 About Election to the Parliament of Ukraine (“draft law”) is provided by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR) and the Council of Europe’s European Commission for Democracy through Law (“Venice Commission”) upon a request from the Ukrainian Parliament Committee on State Building and Local Self-Governance. This joint opinion comments on the most recent version of the draft law (CDL(2009)084). Earlier opinions of the OSCE/ODIHR and the Venice Commission, as well as numerous election reports from previous OSCE/ODIHR and Council of Europe observation missions in Ukraine, provide
excellent background for understanding the historical development of the election legislation in Ukraine. This draft law continues to incorporate recommendations for improvement. The most significant change is the introduction of a new electoral
system. The system proposed in the draft law provides for 450 parliamentarians to be elected under a form of proportional representation that uses territorial election districts, including a foreign territorial election district where ballots are cast by out of country voters. Under the proposed system, most members of parliament will be elected from national lists, with the mathematical possibility for individual political party candidates to be elected within an in-country territorial election district from a territorial list.
Joint Opinion on the Electoral Code of the Republic of Albania
This joint opinion comments on the most recent version of the Electoral Code of the Republic of Albania. Earlier opinions of the OSCE/ODIHR and the Council of Europe’s European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), as well as numerous election reports from previous OSCE/ODIHR and Council of Europe observation missions in Albania, provide excellent background for understanding the historical development of the Code. The most recent version of the Electoral
Code continues to incorporate recommendations for improvement. The most significant change is the introduction of a new electoral system intended to alleviate abuses that occurred under the old electoral system.
Joint Opinion on the Election Code of Georgia as revised up to July 2008
This opinion is offered for consideration by the authorities of Georgia, in support of their efforts to develop a sound legal framework for democratic elections. It should be noted, however, that the election legislation itself only forms the basis for holding elections in accordance with democratic standards. The extent to which any Election Code can contribute to the holding of democratic elections will largely be determined by the political will of state institutions and officials responsible for implementing and upholding the Election Code. The education of civil society and political entities on the election law, effective training of election officials and adherence to the law by all election stakeholders also play an important role in the implementation of democratic elections.
Joint Opinion on the Election Code of the Republic of Armenia as amended up to December 2007
The Venice Commission and the OSCE/ODIHR provide an opinion on the consolidated Election Law of the Republic of Armenia, 1999 as amended to December 2007. This draft opinion is based upon an English translation of the law without further clarifications with the Armenian text. It is possible that some issues have been misinterpreted due to incorrect translation. Previous Joint Opinions by the Venice Commission and the OSCE/ODIHR focused on three main issues: election administration, complaints and appeals, and mechanism for ensuring the integrity of the vote. Previous opinions always underscored that the conduct of genuinely democratic elections depends not only on a detailed and solid election code but on good faith
implementation of the election legislation.
Joint Opinion on the Election Code of Moldova as of 10 April 2008
In April 2008, the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova adopted amendments to the Election Code. Following an official request from the Moldova authorities forwarded to the Venice Commission on 28 August, and in line with their usual co-operation, the OSCE/ODIHR and the Venice Commission have undertaken a joint expert review of the Election Code of Moldova (hereinafter “the code”) as amended. The present opinion should be read in conjunction with the Joint Opinion of the
Venice Commission and the OSCE/ODIHR, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 73rd Plenary Session in December 2007. It focuses on the extent to which the amendments have addressed previous recommendations, and assesses the amendments against OSCE commitments and international standards for democratic elections.