Newsroom
Helsinki 30 years on: OSCE Chairman calls for 'same political courage' to guide future of the Organization
HELSINKI 1 August 2005
HELSINKI, 1 August 2005 - Invoking the spirit of Helsinki of three decades ago, the Chairman-in-Office of the OSCE, Slovenian Foreign Minister Dimitrij Rupel, said the Organization's members needed to display the same political courage in plotting its future course and in standing up for its ideals.
In a keynote address during commemorations in the Finnish capital to mark 30 years since the signature of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe on 1 August 1975 (the Helsinki Final Act), Minister Rupel recalled the prevailing spirit of co-operation and goodwill and urged this should be cultivated again.
"We have managed to achieve what we have in the last 30 years because this vast community has learned to reject ethnic hatred, discrimination, corruption, poverty ... and totalitarian politics", he said.
"For that we can thank the Helsinki process. This process was, on the one hand, a series of meetings and commitments that followed the Final Act and created a momentum for dialogue, confidence-building, and openness. At the same time", he recalled, "it was the underground movement inspired by Principle Seven of the Act - dissidents across Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union rallying around the human rights commitments to force their leaders to keep the promises that they had made.
"The combination of these inter-governmental and non-governmental streams created a river of change that swept away the foundations of communism and a polarized European security system. This helped the process of détente, and built trust and confidence. It linked human rights and security", said the Chairman-in-Office.
"In short, the CSCE/Helsinki process was a key element in ending the Cold War and making Europe safer and more united."
In a speech that devoted as many words to looking forward as to reflecting on the history of 30 years ago, he said recent events had showed the process of creating a Europe whole, free, and prosperous was not yet complete and terrorist attacks were also an attack on OSCE values.
"Peace in the Balkans is still fragile, while in parts of Europe reforms are only a few years in the making. It is important that we keep vigilant and that the OSCE remains involved in South-eastern and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and in Central Asia.
The latter region was an area in urgent need of the OSCE's attention and the Organization remained a key partner in its progress and reforms.
"Consider the presidential election in Kyrgyzstan, which by OSCE standards was for the most part free and fair. Kyrgyzstan is in a process of democratic consolidation. The OSCE should stand ready to be a partner in this process, and must be able to help the new government establish democratic principles and reach economic prosperity," he said.
What happens in Kyrgyzstan was important for transition and change in the whole of Central Asia, the Chairman-in-Office said. The OSCE should help Central Asia deal with issues of governing capacity, corruption, and pockets of lawlessness.
"We cannot afford to tolerate lawless regions within our community. In the age of international terrorism, states have an additional responsibility to exercise sovereignty responsibly. Pockets of lawlessness are gathering zones for terrorists - although extremists also live right among us as citizens.
"What happened in New York on September 11 and then again in Madrid, and now in London is also an attack on the very values that the OSCE holds dear. It is a struggle of ideologies. Our societies and communities will continue being targets ... what we can do, however, is minimise the impact in terms of raw damage resulting from terrorism; marginalize the terrorist's appeal; and keep the worst of weapons out of the hands of the terrorists."
The Chairman-in-Office also alluded to the ongoing reform process within the Organization. It was time, he believed, for the OSCE to become a fully-fledged international organization with member states rather than participating states, and with a legal personality - "maybe in the future we could consider a Statute or Charter".
The Organization also needed to better inform the public about what it did: "The OSCE does great work, but it is an unsung hero. We should sharpen and raise the OSCE's profile. We need to better inform the public about what we do, and this could perhaps be achieved by identifying and concentrating on a few key areas and strategies", the Chairman said.
The process of strengthening the OSCE should respond to real needs and not abstract models, he said: "Our daily work, particularly in the field, should constantly remind us of what we do well and what needs improving. Our field missions are of paramount value and we should continue supporting them and making them work better.
"After summer, we will have an opportunity to exchange views on reform and to set an agenda for strengthening the OSCE's effectiveness. The report of the Panel of Eminent Persons and other contributions provide us with plenty of ideas. Maybe in the near future it will be time to hold an OSCE Summit to crown the reform process and underline the need to take further common action that builds on our common purpose, he added.
In a keynote address during commemorations in the Finnish capital to mark 30 years since the signature of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe on 1 August 1975 (the Helsinki Final Act), Minister Rupel recalled the prevailing spirit of co-operation and goodwill and urged this should be cultivated again.
"We have managed to achieve what we have in the last 30 years because this vast community has learned to reject ethnic hatred, discrimination, corruption, poverty ... and totalitarian politics", he said.
"For that we can thank the Helsinki process. This process was, on the one hand, a series of meetings and commitments that followed the Final Act and created a momentum for dialogue, confidence-building, and openness. At the same time", he recalled, "it was the underground movement inspired by Principle Seven of the Act - dissidents across Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union rallying around the human rights commitments to force their leaders to keep the promises that they had made.
"The combination of these inter-governmental and non-governmental streams created a river of change that swept away the foundations of communism and a polarized European security system. This helped the process of détente, and built trust and confidence. It linked human rights and security", said the Chairman-in-Office.
"In short, the CSCE/Helsinki process was a key element in ending the Cold War and making Europe safer and more united."
In a speech that devoted as many words to looking forward as to reflecting on the history of 30 years ago, he said recent events had showed the process of creating a Europe whole, free, and prosperous was not yet complete and terrorist attacks were also an attack on OSCE values.
"Peace in the Balkans is still fragile, while in parts of Europe reforms are only a few years in the making. It is important that we keep vigilant and that the OSCE remains involved in South-eastern and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and in Central Asia.
The latter region was an area in urgent need of the OSCE's attention and the Organization remained a key partner in its progress and reforms.
"Consider the presidential election in Kyrgyzstan, which by OSCE standards was for the most part free and fair. Kyrgyzstan is in a process of democratic consolidation. The OSCE should stand ready to be a partner in this process, and must be able to help the new government establish democratic principles and reach economic prosperity," he said.
What happens in Kyrgyzstan was important for transition and change in the whole of Central Asia, the Chairman-in-Office said. The OSCE should help Central Asia deal with issues of governing capacity, corruption, and pockets of lawlessness.
"We cannot afford to tolerate lawless regions within our community. In the age of international terrorism, states have an additional responsibility to exercise sovereignty responsibly. Pockets of lawlessness are gathering zones for terrorists - although extremists also live right among us as citizens.
"What happened in New York on September 11 and then again in Madrid, and now in London is also an attack on the very values that the OSCE holds dear. It is a struggle of ideologies. Our societies and communities will continue being targets ... what we can do, however, is minimise the impact in terms of raw damage resulting from terrorism; marginalize the terrorist's appeal; and keep the worst of weapons out of the hands of the terrorists."
The Chairman-in-Office also alluded to the ongoing reform process within the Organization. It was time, he believed, for the OSCE to become a fully-fledged international organization with member states rather than participating states, and with a legal personality - "maybe in the future we could consider a Statute or Charter".
The Organization also needed to better inform the public about what it did: "The OSCE does great work, but it is an unsung hero. We should sharpen and raise the OSCE's profile. We need to better inform the public about what we do, and this could perhaps be achieved by identifying and concentrating on a few key areas and strategies", the Chairman said.
The process of strengthening the OSCE should respond to real needs and not abstract models, he said: "Our daily work, particularly in the field, should constantly remind us of what we do well and what needs improving. Our field missions are of paramount value and we should continue supporting them and making them work better.
"After summer, we will have an opportunity to exchange views on reform and to set an agenda for strengthening the OSCE's effectiveness. The report of the Panel of Eminent Persons and other contributions provide us with plenty of ideas. Maybe in the near future it will be time to hold an OSCE Summit to crown the reform process and underline the need to take further common action that builds on our common purpose, he added.